Jose Ribeiro
HET607 1st semester 2002
Man is the real proof of the
evolutionist theory. As multicellular beings in the top of the evolutionary
scale we will probably be the most adapted being to the environment we belong
to. The constant stimulus we are submitted to are peripherally received by our
sensorial organs and then processed centrally in our brain. Perception of
whatever surround us depends therefore on our sensorial organs, as well as on
our capacity of memorisation and of association of the new information in
relation to the experienced before – knowledge and intelligence. Curiously,
cognitive aspects are more developed in Man than the sensorial ones, being
science a good example. Due to our brain capacity today we have knowledge of
things that would transcend our sensorial capacities. For instance, our sense
of vision is well adapted to the kind of illumination existing naturally in the
Earth. The eyes are an optical system that focus light in the plan of the
retina. The retina has two types of sensorial cells, ones that detect colour,
the cones, and the other more sensitive to light intensity, responding to black
and white, the rods. At low light intensities only the rods are stimulated, and
therefore in the dark our vision happens in black and white. The spectral
sensitivity of the rods has a maximum at 510 nm and the cones have a maximum at
550 nm [1]. Our visible light varies from 400 nm (blue) to 700 nm (red), so our
eyes reach the maximum sensitivity precisely in the middle of this scale.
Curiously, the Sun has a maximum of intensity precisely at 500 nm. Therefore,
it is most likely that our sense of vision developed in accordance with the
colour of our Sun.
For millenia Man constructed
his knowledge based in his senses. Still today, the unlearned man does so. For
the learned and modern Man there is a lot more than the sensorial organs
indicate him. Astronomy is a paradigm of this. Probably one has learned more
about the surrounding Universe in seventy years of radio astronomy, in fifty
years of X-ray astronomy, in forty years of infrared astronomy, ultraviolet
astronomy and gamma-ray astronomy, than during millenia of positional astronomy
or during two centuries of visual telescopic astronomy. In this text
I will talk about the history of radio astronomy, its evolution, science
achieved, and bout the men who interacted in this process. To they I dedicate
this work.
In 1860 James Clerk Maxwell
developed four equations that relate electricity with magnetism. Electric
charges in motion generate magnetic fields and magnets in motion generate
electric fields:
rot E = - dB/dt rot H = J
Maxwell equations describe
that electric and magnetic forces are interconnected in a single phenomenon,
the electromagnetism. An oscillating electric charge causes an electromagnetic
field that radiates at light speed. The oscillation frequency of that charge
defines the frequency of the radiation. The radiation can be represented by its
frequency f in Hertz or by its wavelength l in meters. They are both
related to the speed of propagation of the wave c by the following formula: lf = c.
Depending on l or f, the radiation takes a
certain place in the electromagnetic spectrum that is divided as follows:
Radio waves |
100 km <
l < 10 cm |
Micro waves |
10 cm < l < 1 mm |
Infrared |
1 mm < l < 700 nm |
Visible |
700 nm < l < 400 nm |
Ultraviolet |
400 nm < l < 10 nm |
X-rays |
10nm < l < 10 –2 nm |
Gamma-rays |
l >10-2 nm |
[2]
From the above, the visible
light is only a tiny fraction of the whole electromagnetic spectrum.
The Quantum particle equivalent to electromagnetic
radiation is the photon. Its energy is given by E = hf , in which h is Plank’s
constant. The higher the frequency is, the more energetic the photon is.
The electromagnetic
radiation can be of thermal or non-thermal origin. A dense object radiates in
accordance with its temperature: the higher the temperature T is, the lower the
wavelength of the maximum of energy is.
l max = 0,0029 / T
Some examples of non-thermal radiation are the synchrotron
radiation when an electron enters at great speed in a strong magnetic
field, and the stimulated emission of
radiation that happens in lasers and masers.
From the Quantum mechanics
one knows that atoms radiate at well defined frequencies when the electrons
change of energetic states. On the other hand, moving ionised atoms also
produce radiation as well as molecular collisions.
One defines luminous matter
all matter that emits electromagnetic radiation, whether it is or not visible.
The great majority of baryonic matter in the Universe is luminous although its
detection is not always an easy task.
When a radiation source
moves in relation to a detector, its frequency suffers a shift. This
phenomenon is known as the
Doppler-effect. If the source approaches, the frequency of its radiation
increases and a blueshift takes place
(in analogy with the visible spectrum in which frequency increases towards
blue). When the source recedes its frequency decreases and a redshift takes
place. After the works of Edwin Hubble, one knows that the majority of the
galaxies are receding from us, and so their radiation reaches us at a lower
frequency than the one it would happen should they be motionless. According to
Hubble, the more distance an object is from us, the quicker it recedes (higher
redshift). Another source of redshift is gravity. A mass bends light and forces
it to loose energy. According to E = hf , if the energy decreases then f must
decrease. This phenomenon is known as gravitational redshift. At last we still
have the cosmological redshift, a redshift caused by the expansion of the
Universe.
The extreme example of the
effect of redshift is the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR), that
comes from 300,000 years after the Big Bang, when the Universe became
transparent to radiation. That date corresponds to a redshift of 1000 and in
that date the temperature of the background radiation was of 3000 K. That same
radiation reaches us today at a temperature of
2.726 K. Therefore, due to the redshift, a lot of distant events that
took place at high energies reach us today in
the inferior part of the electromagnetic spectrum as radio waves.
The first work I found
referenced about electric detection in astronomy dates from 1896, from Wilsing and Scheiner,
under the title “On the attempt to detect electrodynamic solar radiation and on
the change in contact resistance when illuminating two conductors by electric
radiation” [3]. Up to 1930, I found two more works, both from 1902 about the
search of hertzian waves emanated by the Sun [3].
It is with Karl Guthe Jansky
(1905-1950) that for the first time radio electromagnetic waves were detected,
from an extraterrestrial source [4]. Jansky was graduated in Engineering by the
Karl Jansky published some
articles between 1932 and 1937 in publications from the
Also in 1937, a work is
published from Fred Laurence Whipple (b.1906) and Jesse Leonard Greenstein
(b.1909) under the tittle “The origin of interstellar radio disturbances”
[4,8,9]. In this work they tried to relate the radio signal coming from
Sagittarius to the Galactic centre.
The first antenna with
parabolic reflector was designed by Grote Reber (b.1911) [10]. This engineer
born in
During Second World War the
scientific activities were used in the war effort. Yet, the works on radar were
implemented, and this device benefited from a great evolution in this period,
mainly in
In the meantime, the still
student Hendrik Christofell van de Hulst (b.1918) [11], predicted that atomic
hydrogen could be detected by radio techniques. The hydrogen atom is composed
by one proton and one electron. The direction of the magnetic field of the
electron depends on its spin. If the magnetic field of the electron is opposed
to the magnetic field of the proton, the atom is in a lower energetic level
than when both fields coincide with. When the spin of the electron changes
making the atom go from a higher energetic level to a lower one, a photon is
emitted with a wavelength of 21 cm. This phenomenon happens once every 10
million years [2]. Yet, as the hydrogen is the most abundant element of the
Universe, the radiation at 21cm (or 1420 MHz) is the best way to detect objects
in radio astronomy.
Only later on, in 1951, Ewen
and Purcell detected in practice this radiation, publishing this fact in a work
in Nature under the tittle “Observation of a line in the galactic radio
spectrum - radiation from galactic hydrogen at 1420 Mc/sec” [3]. At the same
time, Jan Hendrick Oort (1900-1992) confirmed the works of Purcell in the
detection of the radiation at 21cm.
The radio astronomy was
established in
The detection of certain
discrete sources, such as Cygnus A, increased the need to improve the angular
resolution of the radio telescopes. The angular resolution is given by a = 1.22 l/D, being l the wavelength and D the
diameter of the objective, that in this case is the reflector dish of the
antenna. The lower a is the best the
angular resolution is. In the visible radiation one can obtain good angular
resolutions because the wavelength is low, and so with small objectives one can
already obtain a good definition of the discrete objects. The wavelengths in
radio are extremely high, and so large diameters of objectives are required, in
order to obtain angular resolutions allowing the definition of discrete
sources. Many pioneers studied and developed techniques to improve angular
resolution in radio astronomy. One of them was Sir Martin Ryle (1918-1984)
[15]. Ryle used a lot of his time working in discrete sources, having completed
the 2C and 3C surveys with an interferometer of his own design. Interferometry
is based in the principle that the angular resolution obtained by two or more
objectives separated by a distance D is equivalent to the angular resolution of
one single objective with the diameter D. Due to his work in the development of
the techniques of radio astronomy, Ryle was awarded the Nobel Prize of Physics
of 1974. I enhance a passage of a work published in 1950 [16] in which he
states that “The detection of discrete sources of radio waves presents
considerable difficulty, partly because of the small radio frequency power
which is intercepted by the aerial system, but chiefly because of the problem
of distinguishing between the radiation from an individual source, and the
general background radiation from the galaxy (...) the use of an interference
system of considerable resolving power had great advantages over a conventional
pencil-beam aerial system”. Bernard Yarnton Mills (b.1920) [17], an Australian
Engineer and Astronomer, developed in 1952 a system, the cross-type radio
antenna, today known as the Mills Cross. This system aimed to improve angular
resolution in large wavelengths, higher than 1 or 2 meters [1,18,21].
Another important name of
the beginnings of radio astronomy is John Gatenby Bolton (1922-1993) [19]. He
began his career as radar officer, having researched in this area, developing
the system during the Second World War. Part of his work was done in Australia,
having worked with Pawsey in the CSIRO. According to Bolton “one of the
principal aims of the radio astronomer working in the field of radio stars is
to identify the stars with visible objects” [20]. His long scientific career
touched almost all the fields in radio astronomy. Yet, I think his most
important milestone was the identification in the visible of radio sources.
Namely he distinguished himself in the identification of the Crab Nebula.
According to Bolton “The identification of the Crab Nebula was a turning point
in my own career and non-solar radio astronomy. Both gained respectability as
far as the “conventional” astronomers were concerned” [19]. The Crab Nebula had
been studied in simultaneous in 1942 by
Wilhelm Heinrich Walter Baade
(1893-1960) [22,29] and Rudolph Leo Bernhard Minkowski (1895-1976) [23,28].
Yet, the true origin of its radiation, synchrotron radiation, [24] was only
found in 1953 by Iosif Samuilovich Shklovskii (1916-1985) [25], an ucranian
scientist.
The structure of our Galaxy
was deeply studied by Oort [12] and by Frank Kerr (b.1918) [26]. In a work
published in 1958 they wrote: “The view that the Galaxy might have a spiral
structure has been expressed almost since the first discoveries of spiral
structure in Nebulae” [27]. In this work to access the spiral structure of our
Galaxy the 21cm line radio emission of hydrogen was fundamental. [30].Oort also
studied the radio source Sgr A, associating it to the Galactic centre [31].
The first Quasar was
identified by Maarten Schmidt (b.1929) [32], a former Oort student. His work
showed that Quasars are very distant and that only existed in a certain phase
of the evolution of the Universe, what denies Hoyle’s theory of a steady-state
Universe.
In the same year, Thomas
Mattews measured the redshift of the radio source 3C 48 in 0.37 [33].
The Cosmic Microwave
Background Radiation was discovered in 1964 by Arno Penzias (b.1933) [34] and
Robert Wilson (b.1936) [35]. Both worked in Bell Laboratories. This was also a
serendipitous discovery and curiously a very important one: the steady-state
theory was no longer valid, and the Big-Bang theory became a most plausible
one. Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were awarded the Nobel Prize of Physics of 1978.
The CMBR had already been predicted by Philip Janes Edwin Peebles (b. 1935)
[36] and by Robert Henry Dicke (1916-1997) [37]. I should like to underline an
edition of the Astrophysical Journal from 1965 [38], in which there are two
articles, one from Peebles and Dicke “Cosmic Background Radiation”, and the
other from Penzias and Wilson “A measurement of excess antenna temperature at
4080 Mc/s”. Dicke also developed systems for radio detection (Dicke switching).
Anthony Hewish (b. 1924)
[39] was another scientist who greatly developed the technological capacities
of the radio wave detection. He shared in 1974 the Nobel Prize of Physics with
Ryle, with whom he co-worked, not due to his achievements in technological
radio astronomy developments, but for the discovery of Pulsars. Pulsars are
neutron stars, extremely dense, with short rotational periods, that emit
radiation periodically . In a paper written in 1970 Hewish stated “As 1968 drew
to a close the discovery of the rapid Pulsars in Vela and the Crab Nebula
caused an overwhelming swing of opinion in favour of the spinning neutron –
star model (...) the Pulsar in the Crab Nebula, was optically identified with
the star from which the supernova is believed to have originated” [40].
There is however an issue
regarding the discovery of Pulsars. The first detection of a Pulsar was
achieved by a Hewish student, Jocelyn Bell Burnell (b.1943), [41]. Some people
wonder if Hewish should have shared the Nobel Prize with her.
Yet, about this, Jocelyn said “First, demarcation disputes between supervisor
and student are always difficult, probably impossible to resolve. Secondly, it
is the supervisor who has the final responsibility for the success or failure
of the project. (...) Thirdly, I believe it would demean Nobel Prizes if they
were awarded to research students. (...) Finally, I am not myself upset about
it”. In the last thirty years, radio
astronomy became a routine procedure, and mainly the observation capacities
have been improved. With the development of the computers, new algoritms were
created in order to isolate the signal from the noise, such as averaging
techniques and the application of the Fast Fourier Transform. More sensitive
systems were created and the baselines of interferometry were enlarged. Projects,
such as the Space Long Baseline Interferometry, are in process, placing radio
telescopes in orbit, thus obtaining extraordinary angular resolutions [42].
Land-based giant interferometry arrays are also in process, such as ALMA
(Atacama Large Millimeter Array), the expansion of the VLA (Very Large Array)
[43], and SKA (Square Kilometer Array).
Due to radio astronomy a lot
of science was achieved. The major discoveries were:
- The existence of radio
galaxies, active nuclei galaxies, and of the respective jets and
lobes. This discovery lead
to the idea of the existence of supermassive black holes in the centre of those
galaxies.
- The existence of Quasars
and the determination of their distance. As previously mentioned, this
discovery had implications in the cosmological theories.
- The discovery of CMBR.
- The discovery of neutron
stars, Pulsars, and Supernovae. Due to the possibility of measurement of the
orbit of certain binary systems, in which one of the elements is a Pulsar, it
has been verified that the orbital period of these binaries decreases, and that
can be due to the loss of energy by radiation of gravitational waves (Taylor
and Hulse).
- The study of the structure
of our Galaxy and the eventual existence of a back hole in its centre, Sgr A *.
- The study of molecular
clouds. Due to the submillimeter wavelengths (microwaves) it has already been
possible to identify over 100 different molecules in the molecular clouds.
- The Sun and the Planets
studies. Sunspots were associated to radiation. The determination of Mercury
rotation was measured by radar. The discovery of radio emissions of Jupiter and
its electromagnetic interactions with Io.
Nothing of the above
mentioned was possible to have been known if based only in visible radiation.
I could not conclude this
work without a special remark. When making my research for biographies I
noticed that the great majority of the scientists working in radio astronomy
show high longevity, and most of them published works within periods longer
than forty years! I am happy to conclude that radio astronomy gives you
physical and mental health.
1. Astrophysical Techniques
C.R. Kitchin. ISBN 0-7503-0498-7
2. Universe
Kaufmann and Freedman. ISBN 0-7167-3495-8
3. http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Rayburn/Rayburn1.html
4. http://www.physics.gmu.edu/classinfo/astr103/CourseNotes/ECText/Bios/jansky.htm
5. The Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society
of Canada
“A Play Entitled The Beginning of Radio
Astronomy” by Grote Reber
Vol. 82, No.3, June 1988
6. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1947Obs....67...15R
7. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Potapenko.html
8. http://scearch.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=20682
9. http://scearch.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=15349
10. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Reber.html
11. http://scearch.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=7043
12. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Oort.html
13. http://www.asap.unimelb.edu.au/bsparcs/biogs/P000698b.htm
14. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1953JRASC..47..137P
15. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/RyleMartin.html
16. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1950MNRAS.110..508R
17. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Mills.html
18. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1956AJ.....61..167B
19. http://science.org.au/academy/memoirs/bolton.htm
20. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1956AJ.....61..167B
21. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1958Obs....78..116M
22. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1942Apj....96..188B
23. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1942Apj....96..199M
24. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1957IAUS....4..201S
25. http://phys-astro.sonoma.edu/BruceMedalists/Shklovskii/Shklovskii.html
26. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/KerrFrank.html
27. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1958MNRAS.118..379O
28. http://phys-astro.sonoma.edu/BruceMedalists/Minkowski/Minkowski.html
29. http://phys-astro.sonoma.edu/BruceMedalists/Baade/Baade.html
30. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1959IAUS....9..409O
31. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1960MNRAS.121..171O
32. http://phys-astro.sonoma.edu/BruceMedalists/Schmidt/Schmidt.html
33. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1963AJ.....68S.279G
34. http://scearch.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=18356
35. http://scearch.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=20858
36. http://phys-astro.sonoma.edu/BruceMedalists/Peebles/Peebles.html
37. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Dicke.html
38. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1965Apj...142..414D
39. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Hewish.html
40. http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1970ARA%26ª..8..265H
41. http://www.bigear.org/vol1no1/burnell.htm
42. http://www.gb.nrao.edu/ovlbi/main.html
43. http://www.nrao.edu/ovlbi/telescopes/