|
The
short history of the Smoothed Sunspot Number
How
to get the correct SSN ?
There
are different SSN, you wonder ? Indeed, and if you don't take care, this is
superb trap for most HF propagation predictions programs, including VOACAP. In fact all depends on what we speak about, what adds to the
confusion...!
So
let's tackle to this problem and resolve it. First, what does suggest George Lane, one of the main VOACAP
developer and who worked on ionospheric models during 30 years ? George recommends to use the SSN listed at the National Geophysical Data Center, NGDC
FTP website because other SSNs are supposed to give erroneous results. For
the small story, only the NGDC's SSN has been used to calibrate predictions
from VOACAP, hence George's recommendation. We will see a one moment why NGDC
values have been selected.
|
SSN
: current, predicted, equivalent, effective... |
|
NGDC
: |
Predicted
SSN = 41.7 (the only one source for VOACAP) |
|
IPS
: |
SSN
= 44.4 |
|
SEC
: |
Predicted
SSN = 33.6 (stated from IPS) |
|
HFradio.org
: |
Predicted
SSN = 33.6 (stated from IPS) |
|
GeoAlert-Extreme
: |
Equivalent
SSN = 31 (stated from SEC) |
|
WinCAP
Wizard : |
SSN
= 34 (stated from SEC) |
|
DX
ToolBox : |
SSN
= 36 (in fact calculated for August 29) |
|
IonoProbe
: |
Current
SSN = 36 (in fact the Sunspot number for Aug 30)
Effective
SSN = 89 (from real-time interpolation) |
|
HFProp
: |
SSN
= 29 |
|
Some
"SSN" and assimilated values predicted or calculated
for "August 2004" compiled from various observatories
and applications on August 30 at 16h30 UTC. Note that sunspot
number (close to the SSN value but lower), RI and other ISN are
different thing than SSN, therefore I haven't list them to avoid
still more confusion in your mind, Hi ! |
|
Then, what do we notice in the
field when you are looking for the "good" SSN ? SEC/NOAA
is one of the major observatories to maintain SSN indices. However his numbers are slightly different from the one published by
NGDC. Between both sites
the " SSN" difference reaches 60%... Unfortunately, SSN published by SEC
and in spite of the advise displayed on top of their Recent
Solar Indices page is used by many VOACAP-based applications (see the table
below), and is refered as such in their help file as well, hence
the believe that SEC provided the SSN for VOACAP.
HFradio.org
has well understood the message and suggests to all readers searching for
archive and data approved for research to connect on NGDC website. He provides
however the "Predicted SSN" interpolated by IPS
Radio Space Services,
Australia, like do SEC... But here also the SSN provided does not match what IPS called
"SSN" ! (see table below).
In addition,
there are at least four other parameters called "SSN" : NWRA
called the "real" sunspot number SSN, which is calculated from optical
observations of the sun. There is a sunspot number derived from the 10.7 cm
solar radio flux called SSNf (the one used in correlation with SFI). There is a
sunspot number derived from fitting an ionospheric model to ionospheric
measurements. At last there is the Effective Sunspot Number SSNe calculated from
real-time foF2 observations. All of these indices are sometimes used as inputs
to model the ionosphere in HF propagation predictions programs, but all give
differentresults, and not minors, as the next plot shows. It is thus not
surprising that Hfradio.org states that
"forecasting is an inexact science"..., Hi!
 |
|
The
next plot shows that they don't always agree as to what the SSN
should be in that particular context. Document NWRA. |
|
The
short history of SSN
As
you understood, nobody predicts
the same SSN as NGDC ! But there is a good reason. Larry Combs and William
Murtagh work at SEC. The observed values that they manage with their colleagues
are initially the preliminary values which are periodically replaced with the
final values. Official data archive is handled at NGDC and not the SEC
real-time/near real-time operational responsibilities.
The
SSN discrepancy between SEC and the International Sunspot Index (ISN) occurs
because of SIDC's responsibility for the
official SSN database. This database dates back to the early 18th
century. In the late 20th
century, SIDC introduced a scaling factor, so measurements of sunspots from the
much improved telescopes matched measurements of old. This of course will aid
greatly in the assessment of the historical cycle records. The SEC SSN number is
based on the USAF observatories which of course are relatively new telescopes.
No adjustments are made to this SSN calculation.
The
prediction issue is more confusing. There are several methods to predict
sunspots, many of them available on the web. Certain people like one method over
another; consequently, it is impossible to agree on a "one for all"
method. The sunspot prediction established at SEC is officially sanctioned by
the International Space Environment Service (ISES).
The ISES, with representatives from several different countries, is a permanent
service of the Federations of Astronomical and Geophysical Data Analysis
Services (FAGDS). It would be considered the "official" forecast. But
some will argue that it is not the best and opt for a different method.
This
ISES Cycle 23 forecast was the outcome of an international meeting held
in Boulder in September, 1996. An international panel of 12 scientists
met to consider a number of predictions (including the McNish-Lincoln
smoothing function used for the SSN estimation) of the profile and
amplitude of Cycle 23.
Precursor
techniques which use cycle behavior in the declining phase of the
previous cycle as a predictor of the next cycle were a big
consideration. The predicted Cycle 23 minimum and maximum were
established and graphed by a curve fit which smoothes between the most
recent observed values and the remaining forecast values, as shown the graph displayed at left from NASA/MSFC and prepared by David
Hathaway. To
check : Sunspot
cycle and predictions (NASA/MSFC) There
have been a few revisions, mostly because the cycle maximum prediction of 160
was considerably off. But the prediction for a March 2000 maximum date was very
good so the overall curve did not change much. SEC astronomers will be working
with the ISES community again soon for another update.
Note
that the 24th solar cycle began on December
11, 2007 with the appearence of a magnetic knot at the solar surface,
followed on January
3, 2008 with a reversed-polarity bipolar sunspot group.
The
NGDC uses a more pure McNish-Lincoln statistical prediction technique that keys
on the date of solar minimum. This method is quite popular, but by the authors
own admission, it is a better near-term solar cycle predictor (1 year). So even
using NGDC value, we can expect some minor fluctuations for short or mid-terms
predictions. Indeed, theoretically SSN represents
predictions for
what we call the "predicted SSN" or simply the SSN. The
smoothing is usually over time periods of about 6 months to one year or more so both the daily
and the monthly values for the sunspot number as displayed for example at Spaceweather.com
or Sunspotcycle
will always fluctuate around predicted numbers.
Back
to VOACAP settings
Back
to Menu
|