Best Night: January 3-4, with between 45
and 200 faint meteors per hour
Total Duration of Activity: December 28 to January 7
The Quadrantids emanate from the constellation of Boötes, but they get their name from a now defunct constellation called Quadrans Muralis. The radiant never reaches a high altitude for most northern hemisphere observers and southern hemisphere observers will probably see no activity. The location of the radiant in astronomical terms is RA=229 degrees (15 hours 20 minutes), DEC=+49 degrees, but the chart below will also help you find it.

| (Image produced by the Author using Starry Night 2.0 and Adobe Photoshop 5.0. It represents the view from mid-northern latitudes at about 2 a.m. local time around January 4.) |
The first observation of the
Quadrantids seems to have occurred on the morning of January 2,
1825, when Antonio Brucalassi (Italy) remarked that "the
atmosphere was traversed by a multitude of the luminous bodies
known by the name of falling stars." Other observations were
made on January 2, 1835, by Louis Francois Wartmann
(Switzerland), and on January 2, 1838, by M. Reynier
(Switzerland).
First mention that early January
activity might be annual came in 1839, when Adolphe Quetelet
(Brussels Observatory) and Edward C. Herrick (Connecticut)
independently made the suggestion. The meteor shower became known
as the Quadrantids because of its emanation from a now obsolete
constellation called Quadrans Muralis (the Mural Quadrant)
located on some 19th-century star atlases near the point of
meeting between Hercules, Boötes and Draco.
Details of the characteristics of
this shower are not available from the time of its discovery,
although the lack of published observations during the 1840s and
1850s probably indicates minor activity. The first major useful
observation of this shower came in January 1863, when Stillman
Masterman, of the United States, determined the first accurate
radiant point as RA=238 deg, DECL=+46 deg 26 min. The following
year, Professor Alexander Stewart Herschel of England was met
with the unusually high rate of 60 meteors per hour at a time
when the radiant was at an average height of only 19 degrees!
According to J. P. M. Prentice, the ZHR was 131. Although
Herschel's high hourly rate did not become an annual event, it
did help to stimulate interest in the shower in the years that
followed.
Observations of this meteor shower
since 1864 have revealed the earliest activity to be present on
December 28, while the stream last appears on January 7. However,
the shower is particularly noteworthy for a very sharp rise to
maximum activity during January 3 and 4. Keith B. Hindley
(England), using observations of the British Astronomical
Association (BAA) made during the period 1965 to 1971, noted
rates were higher than half the maximum rate for only 16 hours. A
study of BAA, British Meteor Society (BMS) and American Meteor
Society (AMS) observations by the Author reveals that rates tend
to drop below ten per hour just one day before and after the peak
of shower activity. Furthermore, the rise and decline of the
shower activity before and after January 3 and 4 tends to be more
gradual and this apparently confirms the frequently held
suspicion that this stream is made up of both a diffuse and a
compact component. Additional support of this theory was gathered
by Hindley in 1971. Using an IBM 360/65 computer at the
University of Liverpool, telescopic observations of the
Quadrantids were examined. The computer revealed a normal radiant
diameter of 8 degrees, which contracts to less than a degree at
the time of maximum.
Investigating 122 observations of
this shower made between 1864 and 1953, Prentice concluded that
the normal ZHR of the Quadrantids was 45. However, this is far
from being a consistent figure, as he pointed out that very
strong returns occurred in 1909 (ZHR=202) and 1922 (ZHR=79),
while very weak returns were noted in 1901 (ZHR=17), 1927
(ZHR=20) and 1940 (ZHR=21). One figure Prentice did find more
consistent was that of Earth's heliocentric longitude at maximum.
This was determined as 282.9 deg, but it should be stressed that
this represents only visual observations. During 1947 to 1951,
radio-echo observations were conducted at Jodrell Bank and the
average time of maximum occurred when Earth was at a heliocentric
longitude of 282.5 deg. This difference between the times of the
maximum of visual and radio-echo meteors illustrates the
dispersion due to the Poynting-Robertson effect. According to
Hindley, the dispersion factor amounts to 68 minutes of time per
magnitude, thus allowing the radar maximum to occur 6.3 hours
before the visual maximum.
Interestingly, the hourly rate has
continued to fluctuate in more recent times, though the range has
been less prominent than in the past. During the period of 1965
to 1971, observers of the British Astronomical Association
detected maximum hourly rates as low as 65 and as high as 190. In
1975 the Nippon Meteor Society observed a maximum hourly rate of
101.2.
The Quadrantids have not been
consistently studied by visual observers. Cold weather prevalent
in northern latitudes has frequently been cited as the main
reason behind this. Another factor has been the very sharp
maximum the shower displays, which frequently causes even the
most diligent of observers to miss the activity only because they
are in the wrong longitude. A final factor is related to the
general faintness of this shower's meteors, thus requiring
exceptional observing conditions for the main activity of the
shower to be noted.
Some of the best observational
data has been obtained by Norman McLeod III (Florida). He took
all of his Quadrantid observations for the period of 1960 to 1976
and determined an average magnitude of 2.81 (based on 142
meteors). Similar average magnitudes have been obtained by other
observers. Another interesting statistic is the percentage of
meteors seen exhibiting trains. Robert M. Dole (Maine) found that
5.0 percent showed trains in 1933. The British Astronomical
Association found that 5.7 percent showed trains in 1971. Robert
Lunsford (California) obtained percentages of 7.4 and 2.4 in 1984
and 1985.
Examination of the photographic
and radio-echo data by the Author reveals the average Quadrantid
radiant to be at RA=229.5 deg, DECL=49.4 deg, but it should be
pointed out that this is strictly an average. As mentioned
earlier the shower does not possess a sharply defined radiant. In
1953, George E. D. Alcock and J. P. M. Prentice pointed out that
"it has always been difficult to determine the radiant of
the Quadrantid shower". To correct this, they carried out a
program in 1952 to obtain duplicate observations of radiants. On
January 3, they established the existence of 13 active radiants,
thus demonstrating the complexity of the region.
Other studies have shown that the
region is even more complex, since the same radiants are not
necessarily active from year to year. The earliest mention of
this was in 1918, when W. F. Denning and Mrs. Fiammetta Wilson
noted their surprise to find the main radiant in January 1918 to
be about eight degrees north of the normal radiant. They stated
that a more northern radiant had been suspected in January 1916
and 1917, "but the data at the time were regarded as
insufficient." Independent confirmations of the 1918 radiant
came from several observers in England and it was noted that a
weak shower actually did occur from the normal radiant as well.
This apparent change in active radiants from year to year is
probably a by-product of the perturbations experienced by the
stream every 11.86 years from Jupiter.
The planet Jupiter frequently
appears in literature concerning the Quadrantids. In addition to
the radiant changes mentioned, it has been linked to the initial
appearance of the shower in the early 19th century and to the
occasional irregularity in hourly rates. Also considered a result
of perturbations is the slow retrogression of the ascending node,
an occurrence which attracted four studies between 1958 and 1972.
The subsequent calculated rates of the nodal retrogression were
0.31 degrees/century, 0.41 degrees/century, 0.54 degrees/century,
and 0.6 degrees per century.
One of the first studies of the
long-term gravitational effects of Jupiter on the stream was
conducted by S. E. Hamid and M. N. Youssef in 1963. They took six
doubly photographed meteors from 1954 and applied the secular
perturbations of Jupiter during the last 5000 years. They noted
that both the present inclination of 72 degrees and the
perihelion distance of about 1 AU were at their lowest values of
13 degrees and 0.1 AU, respectively, 1500 years ago. About 4000
years ago, these values were very similar to what they are today,
with the inclination being 76 degrees and the perihelion distance
being about 1 AU. As a study of why the meteor stream is composed
of at least two branches, the authors examined the change in the
stream's distance from Jupiter over the last 5000 years. Prior to
today's distance of only 0.3 AU, the stream was found to have
been farthest from Jupiter 1500 years ago and only 0.2 AU away
about 4000 years ago. The authors speculated that the stream's
parent comet was captured by Jupiter about 4000 years ago and
shortly thereafter it developed meteors along its path.
"Because an appreciable number of these meteors, which now
form the Quadrantids, did not suffer another close approach to
Jupiter, the shower is observed to be compact."
Later in 1963, as a by-product of
this study, Hamid and Whipple suggested a possible common origin
for the Quadrantids and the Delta Aquarids, as 1300-1400 years
ago the orbital planes and perihelion distances were very
similar. "Also," they added, "the physical
characteristics of the meteoroids belonging to the two streams
appear to be similar, as judged by their light curves."
In 1979, Iwan P. Williams, Carl D.
Murray and David W. Hughes essentially repeated the Hamid-Youssef
study, but they used a stream model and ten "test"
meteoroids scattered about the orbit. Their study basically
confirmed the earlier study back to 1500 years ago, but found the
inclination and perihelion distance to closely reflect today's
values only 3000 years ago. The study also indicated that,
"casual observations of the original meteoroids at any time
in the interval 200-1000 yr before the present would not have
revealed them to be members of the same stream. 1690 and 1300 yr
ago they started off with similar orbits; these then separated,
only coming together again in the last 200-150 yr." The
authors added that the parent comet probably underwent two major
disruptions-one 1300 years ago and the other 1690 years ago.
The future of the Quadrantid
stream was also examined in the 1979 study. The authors noted
that the inclination would remain near 72 degrees and that the
perihelion distance eventually will exceed 1 AU. Therefore, the
authors predict Earth will no longer encounter the stream by the
year 2400.
During 1985 Ken Fox looked at the
Quadrantid orbit 1000 years in the past, as well as 1000 years in
the future. Nothing different was really noted about the orbit in
the past that was different from the previous studies, although
he did note that maximum occurred at the beginning of August from
a radiant of RA=341.1 deg, DECL=-12.8 deg. Fox revealed Earth
would no longer pass through the Quadrantid orbit 1000 years from
now.
The photographic meteor orbit was based on 25 meteor orbits collected from papers written by Fred L. Whipple in 1954, Richard E. McCrosky and Annette Posen in 1961, P. B. Babadzhanov and E. N. Kramer in 1967, and Gale A. Harvey and Edward F. Tedesco in 1977. The radio-echo orbit was determined by Zdenek Sekanina from data collected by the Harvard Radio Project of 1961-1965.
| Photographic | Radio-echo | |
|---|---|---|
| Argument of Perihelion ( |
170.7 deg. | 168.1 deg. |
| Ascending Node ( |
283.3 deg. | 283.0 deg. |
| Inclination (i) [J2000] | 71.4 deg. | 70.3 deg. |
| Perihelion Distance (q) | 0.975 AU | 0.974 AU |
| Eccentricity (e) | 0.614 | 0.682 |
| Semimajor axis (a) | 2.526 AU | 3.064 AU |
C&MS Home | Calendar | Meteor Information | Meteor WWW Links | Glossary
If you have any questions, please email me