Table of contents :

Introduction

Takahashi TOA 130 and 150 in UV

Newtonian telescope

Dall Kirkham 200 mm F/4- F/15, Mewlon 210 F/2.9-F11.9 and Mewlon 250 F/3-F15

Gregory 250 mm F/3.2-F/28.4

Cassegrain 200 mm F/4-F/15 and Cassegrain 350 F4.9-F29.2

Ritchey-Chretien 500 mm f/3-8

Celestron "classic" and Edge-HD versions overview

Celestron 8 classic and Edge-HD

Celestron 14

Celestron 14 with optimized Schmidt plate position

Celestron 8 with optimized Schmidt plate position

Celestron 14 classic and Edge HD

CDK 355 mm F3 - F11.8

Maksutov-Gregory 90 mm f/15.7, Maksutov-Gregory 200 mm f/15,Maksutov-Rumak 200 mm f/10

Barlow lenses

 


 

500 mm f/3-8 Ritchey - Chretien telescope

  

OSLO model:




NB: By comparison, the M1-M2 distance of the Astrosib RC 500 f/3-8 is 994 mm (instead of  1009.1 mm) while the backfocus (from the surface of M1)  is 335 mm (instead of  300 mm).


Sensitivity of Strelh ratio to backfocus:

The RC design is very sensitive to backfocus. In order to keep the Strelh ratio > 0.9, the backfocus should be within +/- 20 mm of its nominal value.


   

By comparison, the field covered by the ASI1600 (4536 pixels × 3520 pixels × 3.8 microns) at 0.08 arsec/pixel resolution is 0.1° × 0.08°



For the nominal M1-M2 spacing, the radius of the diffraction limited flat field of the RC 500 f/3-8 is 0.11° :


 

rms Optical Path Difference of a 0.11° radius:



500 mm f/3-8 Ritchey - Chretien telescope with the 2× triplet short Barlow


With the 2× triplet short Balow lens (f = -54.95 mm), the radius of the diffraction-limited flat field is 0.06° in green light :




500 mm f/3-8 Ritchey - Chretien telescope with the 2× Clavé Barlow


With the 2× Clavé Barlow lens (f=-113.4 mm), the radius of the diffraction limited flat field shrinks to 0.035° in green light:. Coma increases dramatically away from the optical axis:




500 mm f/3-8 Ritchey - Chretien telescope with 2× "Long Barlow"


With the 2× "Long Barlow" lens (f=-142.3 mm), the radius of the diffraction-limited flat field is 0.074° in green light:



 Back to comparison of telescope optical design for high resolution imaging

Return to home page